Trough the Franco-American Prism
FR  -  NL
Culture & Countries
Freedom, Equality, Fraternity through the Franco-American prism
November 3, 2020

A “love-hate” relationship between The United States and France

France-USAGiven what’s happening in the United States, as intercultural consultants, we ask ourselves every day how we will approach our intercultural trainings on the United States and France without triggering passionate and heated debates due to the special relationship that reigns between these two countries, often referred to as a “love-hate” relationship.

In this article, we have chosen a deliberately intercultural approach by focusing the debate to the level of the values ​​which explain the impact on mentalities and therefore trigger associated behaviors. This “love-hate” relationship can be partly explained by the fact that we have three values in common: those of freedom, equality and fraternity (relation to the collective), but that the meaning and the combination among the three translate in different, even opposing ways.

Nearly 250 years ago, the French and the Americans forged an unlikely friendship against a common enemy: the English. When the Marquis de Lafayette crossed the Atlantic to fight for the American cause, and subsequently, when Thomas Jefferson exerted an influence on the writing of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, inspired in part by the American Declaration of Independence, the fate of the two countries was sealed forever. However, despite these points of convergence between modern France and the newly established United States, both defining themselves as staunch defenders of Equality and Freedom, their respective visions of these values ​​were and still are enigmatic to each other.

Although the French Revolution eradicated France’s feudal past and the Monarchy became a Republic, the State remains highly centralized and the head of state still enjoys unequivocal power. Equality became a real rallying cry, but authority remained in the hands of the elites and the much-maligned privilege system was maintained in new ways. This elitism still exists today through the education system. Even if the Grandes Ecoles system, similar to the Ivy League in the US, is the subject of much debate. In the collective unconscious, admission to one of these “Schools” still seems to be a condition of access for young French people who aspire to positions of economic or political power. Education is certainly less expensive than in the United States, even free sometimes, but the academic requirements and a form of self-censorship make access to these elite schools difficult for children from families of lower social classes, often of immigrant origin. Meritocracy is mainly academic in France: a diploma from a top school is seen as the sine qua non for success in life.


In the United States, the Declaration of Independence proclaims that “all Men are created equal,” so meritocracy is enshrined from the founding of the country by the early settlers. This belief, more aspirational than realistic, nonetheless attracts populations from all over the world. They immigrate to the United States with the hope of starting new lives thinking that their social or economic class, their ethnicity, religion or political affiliation will not be an obstacle to their success.

Millions of people risk their lives, abandon their families and their roots to live the “American Dream”. They come with the hope that hard work and unwavering determination will be enough for them to improve the future of their children. Where there’s a will, there’s a way. American-style meritocracy is not determined by birth but by success and money.


This American egalitarian system was fueled by a strong ideal of freedom. The Declaration of Independence states Americans “are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights; that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” These words still resonate with Americans today, but many of them also realize that a segment of the population has not been granted these basic rights because of their race or ethnicity. The protests across the country following the death of Georges Floyd and other people of color are unique in bringing together both white and black people to denounce systemic racism, injustice and police violence due to the color of their skin. Many realize that these core ideals do not apply to all Americans equally and how “discolored” the collective perspective is (pun intended). The current pandemic is bringing to the surface these socioeconomic disparities by dramatically and disproportionately affecting people of color. For many, the realization of the discrimination suffered by their friends, neighbors, or coworkers is a real shock. They are protesting in the streets today to demand that the principles of the Founding Fathers finally apply to all Americans, without exception. Joe Biden’s supporters are counting on him to take measures to resolve these social and economic disparities.

Likewise in France, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, partly inspired by the philosophers of the Enlightenment, proclaims: “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights. Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good… All citizens, being equal in its eyes, shall be equally eligible to all high offices, public positions and employments, according to their ability, and without other distinction than that of their virtues and talents. » However, the French system, paralyzed by centuries of social stratification, mainly benefits the elites. Added to this are the colonial heritage and the impact of globalization that has changed the face of the increasingly multicultural French population. Many of its citizens feel abandoned, leading to an identity crisis manifested in the “yellow vest” movement.

Thus, in both countries, we are attached to the notions of Freedom and Equality. A line of thought to explain the difference in interpretation of these values ​​is the relationship to the Collective.

The relationship to the Collective

In fact, the French state was built on the preponderance of the community. Fraternity is institutionalized. The system is based on the sharing and redistribution of wealth by the state, which allows all citizens to have free access to education and health care. France believes in the welfare state with a social contract to protect its citizens and thus ensure their freedom and equality.

In the United States, the Founding Fathers wanted to mark a break by limiting the role of the state to sovereign functions. The current of thought was deliberately liberal and anti-interventionist in principle. According to Americans, the market and the private sector are the best way to guarantee individual freedom. Thus, education and health are essentially private fields. Americans generally do not wish to pay taxes to finance the needs of the community, as the French understand it. American logic is to pay individually according to one’s respective needs, which explains the importance of philanthropy in the United States. Historically, the richest Americans have no objection to redistributing their wealth. However, they wish to choose themselves in the name of freedom but also of a core value that is belief in the individual and personal responsibility. Fraternity is assured by individual initiatives. Equality is not guaranteed by the American state, but anyone can succeed. With equal opportunity, a person just has to take control of his or her destiny and is free to work toward his or her goal through self-determination. It is probably these values ​​taken to the extreme that attract supporters of Donald Trump and a large part of Republicans for that matter: only minimal government intervention can guarantee the full development of Americans and too much intervention by the state could be the main threat to the country.

Two different approaches to managing the pandemic

The two different approaches to managing the pandemic are a good illustration of this different perspective.

In France, there was initially a nation-wide lockdown; decisions were taken in Paris by the centralized state. When the government proposed to decentralize, leaving it to the regional prefects to make decisions adapted to their specific context to avoid a second wave of Covid 19, voices rose accusing the government of not fulfilling its responsibilities. And yet, the measures announced by the Minister of Health demanding the closure of all restaurants and bars in Marseilles triggered real hostilities between Paris and the French regions.

In the United States, as a result of federalism, lockdown and its rules vary from state to state. While Washington DC underestimated the effects of the virus, California decided to lockdown (shelter in place) as of March. Initiatives have been carried out at the local level and on an individual basis. Some American brands like Staples donated its drive-in infrastructure to allow the State of Massachusetts to carry out its free screening campaign. Celebrities are mobilizing to act in place of the government. In April, Lady Gaga, supported by the Global Citizen movement in collaboration with the World Health Organization, hosted an 8-hour live virtual event, “One World: Together at Home”. Major international musicians performed from their homes and raised $128 million for the World Health Organization’s Covid-19 Solidarity Response Fund and local NGOs including food banks and housing providers.

These two countries are linked by their shared love of democratic ideals, but their respective historical roots lead to different interpretations of Freedom, Equality and Fraternity. However, we find similarities on both sides of the Atlantic in their response to current events: identity crisis, demonstrations against police violence and racism, anti-mask movements and the freedom to work. So, is it love-hate or are they just different in the way they deal with current global upheavals? Looking back, we note that serious crisis situations are key moments for a culture to evolve. Thus we notice that some Americans are beginning to realize the interest of institutionalized solidarity, and the French are beginning to notice the benefits of more local decision-making. Will our two great transatlantic democracies grow stronger as a result of the events of 2020?

Sylvie Day, Julia Gaspar-Bates, Barbara Mattison, Pamela Strawgate

This article is the result of a Franco-American collaboration:
Sylvie Day, Julia Gaspar-Bates, Barbara Mattison, Pamela Strawgate
Akteos Consultants

About author

French-American Team

French-American Team

Sylvie Day, Julia Gaspar-Bates, Barbara Mattison, Pamela Strawgate

There are 0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Lean management

Is the LEAN approach cultural?

Despite its longevity, the LEAN method has not age...

Read more

The Coronavirus Epidemic Across Cultures

Are All Cultures Equal When It Comes to Coronaviru...

Read more

Coronavirus: Going Out Masked, A Question of Culture!

A “love-hate” relationship between The...

Read more